01
Build the shortlist
Select the candidates that should be compared for the same role.
Candidate comparison
Compare candidates without losing the evidence
Place shortlisted candidates side by side using the same role criteria. Move from summary to transcript, answer and reviewer context before making a decision.
Side-by-side shortlist
Role-aligned criteria
Open the answer behind each score
Team review context
Example workflow
Role-aligned criteria
Candidate comparison
Candidate comparison
Candidate A
Candidate B
Fewer tab switches
Evidence before summary
Shared decision context
In one sentence
Intrvio candidate comparison helps hiring teams review shortlisted candidates against consistent role criteria while retaining links to the underlying interview and assessment evidence.
How it works
A clear path from setup to decision
02
Compare consistently
Use aligned criteria, interview evidence and assessment results.
03
Document the decision
Return to answer-level evidence and capture the team’s review context.
Designed for hiring teams
Operational clarity without losing candidate context
Fewer tab switches
Review the relevant candidates and criteria in one comparison view.
Evidence before summary
Open the source material behind a score or recommendation.
Shared decision context
Give reviewers a common frame for the same role.
Connected platform
Use it with the rest of the hiring workflow
Frequently asked questions
What employers need to know
Comparison is most meaningful when candidates share the same role and evaluation framework. Intrvio’s workflow is designed around that consistent context.
See the workflow with your own hiring process
Walk through the employer and candidate experience with the Intrvio team.
Talk through your hiring process