Quick answer
Use AI to structure evidence, not to hide decisions.
Prioritize candidate notice, audit logs, and reviewable scorecards.
Choose a narrow workflow before buying a broad suite.
Requirement
What to ask
Intrvio support
Risk if missing
Human oversight
Who makes the final decision?
Employer reviewer
Opaque automation
Evidence
Can reviewers inspect transcripts?
Yes, scorecard evidence
Low trust
Consistency
Is the rubric role-specific?
Yes
Interviewer drift
Compliance
Are notices and logs available?
Trust and compliance pages
Audit gaps
AI hiring tools are not one category
A sourcing assistant, a video interview platform, a note taker, and a scoring workflow all affect hiring differently. Compare tools by the decision point they touch.
Intrvio is for structured first-round interviews, where consistency and evidence quality matter more than broad automation claims.
Governance is a buying requirement
Hiring AI claims should be backed by candidate notices, human review, audit logs, and documentation. These controls are not extras when the tool influences screening.
Sources
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
It is software that uses AI to support sourcing, screening, interviewing, scoring, note-taking, or hiring workflow decisions.